This last Thursday, April 2nd, Craig Scott of iwamaotoscott gave a lecture/presentation at the Micheal Schwartz Auditorium at Kent State University.
The lecture happily consisted of much more than a simple traipse through a project portfolio as Scott illustrated not only a series of projects ranging from art installations and large scale masterplan proposals, but also the rigor and trials that exemplified a well thought out and practiced approach.
An aspect that permeated the projects shown was an almost childlike sense of awe at exploiting the constraints of materials. Utilizing digital media to create electronic models, ideas were quickly studied and metrics of evaluation were formed. However, what makes iwamotoscott architects so very interesting is the then deliberate exercise in physically studying the material constraints and exploring the visual and tactile relationship of construction.
From the Voissuir Cloud installation at sci arc (which employed a rigorous structural study and painstaking craft of construction to execute) to the REEF ps1 proposal (which required a half scale model to verify that the inferred material properties would react in a predictable fashion) the love of crafting shines through. Somewhere through their history, Lisa Iwamoto and Craig Scott's desire to discover the pure truths of material exploration has ingrained itself richly within the partner's ideals and it is a testament to the tenacity of the firm that these explorations are so finely executed.
I suggest that greater attention is to be paid to the impetus behind these and other proposed projects including the Ordos 100 villa, Hydro-Net (designed for the History Channel's City of the Future, and the proposal for Battery Park South (whose images should be released soon) for each project, as diverse in construction or scope as possible, rely on a sense of desire to empirically explain the truth of and through materiality and then fashion the proper technique to celebrate it.
Friday, April 03, 2009
Monday, March 30, 2009
Craig Scott Lecture - Kent State University
somewhere around here:at:
...sort of old news as the "happening" has been posted on the Kent Arch College website (danger resizes your browser cause it knows better than you) for a bit now, however it took me a while to get a poster that I could actually reference and verify and glean actual information from such as time and or place. Perhaps Kent State actually would like people to come to these once in a while. Sigh.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
scale: amenity and destination
During an interesting conversation regarding the dissonance of what constitutes a community amenity and a destination, the simple fact that a personal lens of scale creates the metric of difference came to light. Whether applied to the marvel that was the enclosed shopping mall, the strip mall, the arcade mall or to a grander plan such as a convention center or even theme park, the hubris of identifying the personal boundaries of space constituted a more appropriate understanding of determining which population is being served and whether said population forms a "local" community or not.
To be fair the main purpose of the aforementioned conversation was whether a destination could result in direct community amenity, in this case "Would the Cleveland Med Mart truly bring some life to downtown Cleveland?" The lens through which the incident was being initially studied was as a Clevelander who would like an excuse to go downtown more but find it a bit boring. What would the Med Mart do for people like me?
This acknowledgment was immediately a mistake. I am not part of the community that the Med Mart would serve, there is a larger National/International Medical community to which is being targeted, I belong to a second localized group, one that is tied via geographic location which according to my previous statement of "finding downtown Cleveland boring" can easily be overridden. Here usage beats simple proximity. Would the Medical community be drawn to the Med Mart? If it offers ease, convenience and purpose then one could assume that the community would definitely visit. Is there a geographic based penalty (distance = less opportunity to visit)? Possibly but again, geospatial location can be easily overridden (through the marvels of planes, trains and automobiles).
What then about local community amenity such as grocery stores, libraries, schools, etc. Some offer function that cannot overcome geographic location (schools typically serve a specific community), some destinations must serve those with limited transportation options (libraries, grocery stores) some overcome geographic limitations by constructing their own transportation system (hosptial/healthcare). Here the scale of the community being served is lessened as there are multiple destination/amenities created to serve multiple communities. There are more than one library, grocery store, school, hospital, each created to serve within a certain geographic location. Here the argument that the community is smaller and possibly more distinct allows this scale to be seen as the distinction between amenity and destination. However if the community (say the International Medical Community*) is highly mobile and there are less fewer amenity/destinations then the label may change depending on if your metric for scale is based upon local community or the more specific International Medical Community.
So what of the all important automobile? This creation really threw a monkey wrench into the scale argument of community amenity and destination. Initially the sense of scale shrinks to include only those that are located within the automobile. As most communities do not strictly delineate with signage at the borders the automobile creates this highly mobile but highly contained sense of space that defeats the geographic limitation (average daily commute in the US is around 48 minutes) exposing the auto traveler to multiple communities in one journey albeit usually only to limited areas (those with the quickest passage through). Previously to the advent of the auto (and for most citizens until they turn at least 16) the local community is defined by a radius that is easily walked (or ridden by bicycle) which allows not only the option of a more meandering path (and greater intimacy with the community) but also sets specific delineations of where the acceptable "edges" of the community are (based upon physical exertion, spatial familiarity and geographic properties). Again, another scale is developed that must be supplemented by an eagerness to travel once auto access is granted.
Public transportation is an anomaly that stitches the difference between pedestrian level travel and auto travel. The community is expanded to include whomever is on the bus/train and the continuous stops and less engaged operation (for the passengers) allow more time to identify with fabric along the route. Still travel is limited to a predetermined path, however it becomes more than simply a destination to destination journey as there is the introduction of a larger population (passengers) and more frequency of interactive changes (stations).
Regional access allows the metric by what we consider an amenity to shift based upon our mobility however the way that we also define ourselves alters what the basis of our communities are. Simply put, if we were to only define ourselves as Clevelanders, then our community would be simply Cleveland. If were to expand our self definition to include cultural attributes such as hobbies, occupation, or interests then our sense of community would expand and by extension our definition of amenity. The argument that is most often heard is based upon an assumption of which community is being served and in which manner, regardless of whether the "target demographic" is stated. Air travel and the ease in which some may attain access to other parts of the world have created a lens that can encompass a larger community, stretching from the city region to encompass entire nations. There is a direct connection between our mobility and geographic limitation and what can be logically considered a "community amenity" if the community is being defined by only geographic terms. This makes an important distinction between the attempts to capitalize on existing cultural/community amenities in order to create greater exposure to a larger "culturally based" community.
Again, to make a proper argument a sense of scale must be defined in order to validate the assumptions made when considering what a community truly is. Today's modern society is highly mobile and exploratory and has found easy ways to breach the geographic limitations that have been placed upon it in earlier decades. This isn't to say that local geographic communities would succeed if they abandoned all local amenities, but it is to suggest that cultural destinations are rapidly becoming cultural amenities and population migration will shift in response to such.
*to be fair I do not know if there is an International Medical Community but it sounds scary to me.
To be fair the main purpose of the aforementioned conversation was whether a destination could result in direct community amenity, in this case "Would the Cleveland Med Mart truly bring some life to downtown Cleveland?" The lens through which the incident was being initially studied was as a Clevelander who would like an excuse to go downtown more but find it a bit boring. What would the Med Mart do for people like me?
This acknowledgment was immediately a mistake. I am not part of the community that the Med Mart would serve, there is a larger National/International Medical community to which is being targeted, I belong to a second localized group, one that is tied via geographic location which according to my previous statement of "finding downtown Cleveland boring" can easily be overridden. Here usage beats simple proximity. Would the Medical community be drawn to the Med Mart? If it offers ease, convenience and purpose then one could assume that the community would definitely visit. Is there a geographic based penalty (distance = less opportunity to visit)? Possibly but again, geospatial location can be easily overridden (through the marvels of planes, trains and automobiles).
What then about local community amenity such as grocery stores, libraries, schools, etc. Some offer function that cannot overcome geographic location (schools typically serve a specific community), some destinations must serve those with limited transportation options (libraries, grocery stores) some overcome geographic limitations by constructing their own transportation system (hosptial/healthcare). Here the scale of the community being served is lessened as there are multiple destination/amenities created to serve multiple communities. There are more than one library, grocery store, school, hospital, each created to serve within a certain geographic location. Here the argument that the community is smaller and possibly more distinct allows this scale to be seen as the distinction between amenity and destination. However if the community (say the International Medical Community*) is highly mobile and there are less fewer amenity/destinations then the label may change depending on if your metric for scale is based upon local community or the more specific International Medical Community.
So what of the all important automobile? This creation really threw a monkey wrench into the scale argument of community amenity and destination. Initially the sense of scale shrinks to include only those that are located within the automobile. As most communities do not strictly delineate with signage at the borders the automobile creates this highly mobile but highly contained sense of space that defeats the geographic limitation (average daily commute in the US is around 48 minutes) exposing the auto traveler to multiple communities in one journey albeit usually only to limited areas (those with the quickest passage through). Previously to the advent of the auto (and for most citizens until they turn at least 16) the local community is defined by a radius that is easily walked (or ridden by bicycle) which allows not only the option of a more meandering path (and greater intimacy with the community) but also sets specific delineations of where the acceptable "edges" of the community are (based upon physical exertion, spatial familiarity and geographic properties). Again, another scale is developed that must be supplemented by an eagerness to travel once auto access is granted.
Public transportation is an anomaly that stitches the difference between pedestrian level travel and auto travel. The community is expanded to include whomever is on the bus/train and the continuous stops and less engaged operation (for the passengers) allow more time to identify with fabric along the route. Still travel is limited to a predetermined path, however it becomes more than simply a destination to destination journey as there is the introduction of a larger population (passengers) and more frequency of interactive changes (stations).
Regional access allows the metric by what we consider an amenity to shift based upon our mobility however the way that we also define ourselves alters what the basis of our communities are. Simply put, if we were to only define ourselves as Clevelanders, then our community would be simply Cleveland. If were to expand our self definition to include cultural attributes such as hobbies, occupation, or interests then our sense of community would expand and by extension our definition of amenity. The argument that is most often heard is based upon an assumption of which community is being served and in which manner, regardless of whether the "target demographic" is stated. Air travel and the ease in which some may attain access to other parts of the world have created a lens that can encompass a larger community, stretching from the city region to encompass entire nations. There is a direct connection between our mobility and geographic limitation and what can be logically considered a "community amenity" if the community is being defined by only geographic terms. This makes an important distinction between the attempts to capitalize on existing cultural/community amenities in order to create greater exposure to a larger "culturally based" community.
Again, to make a proper argument a sense of scale must be defined in order to validate the assumptions made when considering what a community truly is. Today's modern society is highly mobile and exploratory and has found easy ways to breach the geographic limitations that have been placed upon it in earlier decades. This isn't to say that local geographic communities would succeed if they abandoned all local amenities, but it is to suggest that cultural destinations are rapidly becoming cultural amenities and population migration will shift in response to such.
*to be fair I do not know if there is an International Medical Community but it sounds scary to me.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Tremont Art Walk - March 2009
VoteAcrylic Painting by Kaitlynn Altgilbers
Tremont Art Walk
Friday, March 13, 2009
Tremont Neighborhood, Cleveland, Ohio
6 - 10pm
Sunday, March 08, 2009
salvation
The Diocese of Cleveland is forced to make the uncomfortable decision of closing and merging some selected places of worship to deal with shifting demographics. The announcement of which some 50 Cleveland Catholic churches are to be closed will is scheduled to be made around March 14th. Historically Cleveland, an immigrant city, was populated with a great number of ethnic enclaves (or ghettos if one were to use the term properly) whose inhabitants would immediately identify themselves with their religious affiliation before ethnicity when asked to describe themselves. A great number of the inner ring suburbs are certainly riddled with places of worship, a great number of them quite exquisite and breathtaking in their construction, simplicity and obvious care.
Personally early Sunday strolls to fetch the paper (whose ever shrinking comment can be criticism for another day) allows a rather selfish vice of mine; to walk past the few places of worship along the way and catch the sounds of praise, song and homily, beautiful and heart warming (even when muffled through the heavy doors). Immediately my mind's eye remembers the sun streaming through the great stained glass windows of my youth, the droning of the priest (I was an impatient lad) and the sense of anticipation for the traditional family breakfast at my grandparent's. The Church followed the traditional Catholic style with proper nave and side aisles, a wide yet shallow apse and rather small transepts which hinted at the proper form. Tall and spacious inside I was lucky enough to have my first job there, helping my father, at the age of 13. There was a community pride that was evident those days in how the congregation knew each others family and history. Handshakes and pleasantries were exchanged and actually meant, even during the holidays when the congregation would grow to standing room only it was not uncommon to leave the church an hour or more after the sermon had ended. I was lucky enough to grow up around a such a place that actually felt as if it were God's home, if not for the architecture but for what it meant to the parishioners. I imagine that each holy place is like that to those that take the time to get to know it.
Now that some churches are being closed, offering that the community has no suggestions or proper reuses, what are to become of these structures? There are so very few buildings that offer comparable inspirational spaces. It would be a shame to simply raze the buildings when the craftsmanship and attention to construction/detail are so typically well done. However it may be a far better fate then some of the heavy handed renovations which may offer a more insulting and tragic end for beautiful and holy structures by carving the grand spaces or tacking on semi contextual additions.
In fact the Cleveland City Council is currently looking to extend landmark protection to include churches under an umbrella of historic preservation which includes maintaining the current windows and built in iconography (identified as "fixtures" under commercial property covenants) as part of the property and therefore under protection. Whether the properties belong in their entirety to the diocese or can be sold in an altered state to private owners isn't the entire point, Granted historic rose windows and hand carved pews could add proper accents of character to the proper new tenant however the bones of these structures should be the centerpoint of the conversation.
I find the opportunities rather intriguing. If the churches are closed, found of value/given some sort of landmark protection status, desanctified for public use there should be quite a few interested parties that could come up with some reasonable and respectful use (such as the Josaphat Arts Hall or Nottingham Spirk). However the opportunity would have to present itself and the possible tenant would be wise to respect not only the property but also the community in which the ex-church may reside.
The chance to create a worship space should be held in high esteem. An architect or designer tasked with the challenged will typically be given the seemingly opposing opportunities of working with a group or council, a modest budget and the gesture of creating a space that allows for the proper sense of decorum and awe with which in to worship. The task may truly seem a high endeavor and arguably may very well be connected to any great historical movement of architecture as well as some seemingly maddening obsessions. But what else would one expect? Here man is asked to simply recreate a simple building to an entity infinitely more powerful and beautiful than one could imagine. How is one to simply capture the joy and beauty with which to properly instill devotion upon visiting worshipers? The answer would be a varied as there are religious interpretations and to each structure, enclave, collective, there is an attempt to create an identifiable space. What then would be the proper response when the useful life of the church as designed as a place or worship, is at an end?
These buildings were not only once full of life and love but conceived and constructed along a similar premise. Designed to do more then simply shelter a great many are asked to lift man's spirit and grant upon them the mantle of grace, humility and respect. These structures are more than just buildings, they are our interpretations of hope and dream made physical and real. They were our family and friends, our salvation and trust, so much more than mere wood and stone and metal. They were the center or our communities.
They deserve our respect, our labor, our joy and our salvation.
more reading:
Desanctified churches get new life
Cleveland Catholic Diocese's church closing process near completion - Plain Dealer
BlogOnTheCity may have a more succinct summation and points to a better Plain Dealer article
Personally early Sunday strolls to fetch the paper (whose ever shrinking comment can be criticism for another day) allows a rather selfish vice of mine; to walk past the few places of worship along the way and catch the sounds of praise, song and homily, beautiful and heart warming (even when muffled through the heavy doors). Immediately my mind's eye remembers the sun streaming through the great stained glass windows of my youth, the droning of the priest (I was an impatient lad) and the sense of anticipation for the traditional family breakfast at my grandparent's. The Church followed the traditional Catholic style with proper nave and side aisles, a wide yet shallow apse and rather small transepts which hinted at the proper form. Tall and spacious inside I was lucky enough to have my first job there, helping my father, at the age of 13. There was a community pride that was evident those days in how the congregation knew each others family and history. Handshakes and pleasantries were exchanged and actually meant, even during the holidays when the congregation would grow to standing room only it was not uncommon to leave the church an hour or more after the sermon had ended. I was lucky enough to grow up around a such a place that actually felt as if it were God's home, if not for the architecture but for what it meant to the parishioners. I imagine that each holy place is like that to those that take the time to get to know it.
Now that some churches are being closed, offering that the community has no suggestions or proper reuses, what are to become of these structures? There are so very few buildings that offer comparable inspirational spaces. It would be a shame to simply raze the buildings when the craftsmanship and attention to construction/detail are so typically well done. However it may be a far better fate then some of the heavy handed renovations which may offer a more insulting and tragic end for beautiful and holy structures by carving the grand spaces or tacking on semi contextual additions.
In fact the Cleveland City Council is currently looking to extend landmark protection to include churches under an umbrella of historic preservation which includes maintaining the current windows and built in iconography (identified as "fixtures" under commercial property covenants) as part of the property and therefore under protection. Whether the properties belong in their entirety to the diocese or can be sold in an altered state to private owners isn't the entire point, Granted historic rose windows and hand carved pews could add proper accents of character to the proper new tenant however the bones of these structures should be the centerpoint of the conversation.
I find the opportunities rather intriguing. If the churches are closed, found of value/given some sort of landmark protection status, desanctified for public use there should be quite a few interested parties that could come up with some reasonable and respectful use (such as the Josaphat Arts Hall or Nottingham Spirk). However the opportunity would have to present itself and the possible tenant would be wise to respect not only the property but also the community in which the ex-church may reside.
The chance to create a worship space should be held in high esteem. An architect or designer tasked with the challenged will typically be given the seemingly opposing opportunities of working with a group or council, a modest budget and the gesture of creating a space that allows for the proper sense of decorum and awe with which in to worship. The task may truly seem a high endeavor and arguably may very well be connected to any great historical movement of architecture as well as some seemingly maddening obsessions. But what else would one expect? Here man is asked to simply recreate a simple building to an entity infinitely more powerful and beautiful than one could imagine. How is one to simply capture the joy and beauty with which to properly instill devotion upon visiting worshipers? The answer would be a varied as there are religious interpretations and to each structure, enclave, collective, there is an attempt to create an identifiable space. What then would be the proper response when the useful life of the church as designed as a place or worship, is at an end?
These buildings were not only once full of life and love but conceived and constructed along a similar premise. Designed to do more then simply shelter a great many are asked to lift man's spirit and grant upon them the mantle of grace, humility and respect. These structures are more than just buildings, they are our interpretations of hope and dream made physical and real. They were our family and friends, our salvation and trust, so much more than mere wood and stone and metal. They were the center or our communities.
They deserve our respect, our labor, our joy and our salvation.
more reading:
Desanctified churches get new life
Cleveland Catholic Diocese's church closing process near completion - Plain Dealer
BlogOnTheCity may have a more succinct summation and points to a better Plain Dealer article
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Put some money where my mouth wants to be...
Just a quick note that constantly startles me for some reason. Clevelanders are constantly so quick to point out how the Great Lake Erie is our greatest asset. One that needs to be recognized, honored and enjoyed. However, every time the weather gets somewhat nice (which is quite often in the summer months) I would like nothing better than to find a nice restaurant with views of the lake that aren't buried under the stench of rotting fish flocking to the warms waters of the Cleveland Electric Company - or whatever that steam producing factory is (Sorry Quay 55 restaurant) or overlooking a salt mine (Sorry Harp) from which to enjoy views of the lake, a nice sandwich or salad and a couple of delicious local beers.
Why is this so hard to accomplish?
If anyone has any suggestions I am more than open to hear them. To note Pier W has fantastic views and menu and Lakehouse Cafe offers a nice place for lazy weekend brunch overlooking the lake while sipping coffee, so there are some options.
Amazingly the city seems to turn its back on its celebrated lake when it comes to recognizing the import of something to lazily stare at or for sharing a sunset.
Whats up with that? Is there some economic model that prevents places from opening up with views of Lake Erie? Fear of flying saucers or noticing Canada?
*as a personal memo, last time I wanted a burger on the lake the ladyfriend and I headed out to Sandusky via Lake Ave (route 6). Partially because by the time we got out there we had given up looking and settled for sandwiches in downtown Sandusky (historic) which was dead for a downtown, blocks from the lake (no view). Argh.
Why is this so hard to accomplish?
If anyone has any suggestions I am more than open to hear them. To note Pier W has fantastic views and menu and Lakehouse Cafe offers a nice place for lazy weekend brunch overlooking the lake while sipping coffee, so there are some options.
Amazingly the city seems to turn its back on its celebrated lake when it comes to recognizing the import of something to lazily stare at or for sharing a sunset.
Whats up with that? Is there some economic model that prevents places from opening up with views of Lake Erie? Fear of flying saucers or noticing Canada?
*as a personal memo, last time I wanted a burger on the lake the ladyfriend and I headed out to Sandusky via Lake Ave (route 6). Partially because by the time we got out there we had given up looking and settled for sandwiches in downtown Sandusky (historic) which was dead for a downtown, blocks from the lake (no view). Argh.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Look UP to Cleveland call for Technical Advisors
Look UP to Cleveland, "a nationally recognized high school leadership development and diversity awareness program for Greater Cleveland’s outstanding high school leaders" is looking for technical advisors to participate in the upcoming series to develop "goal-driven, civic vision plans for a designated Cleveland neighborhood".
Those with urban planning, architecture or community leadership experience are asked to apply.
"Be a part of an exciting program! Look Up To Cleveland, a student leadership program, is seeking urban planners, architects and community leaders to serve as technical advisors to student teams.
NEEDED: Individuals with expertise or interest in community planning, architecture, urban design or other fields to volunteer their time and expertise as team advisors working with 17-18 high school juniors to develop goal-driven, civic vision plans for a designated Cleveland neighborhood. The high school students are enrolled in Look Up To Cleveland, a program for outstanding student leaders from public, private and parochial schools across Cuyahoga County.
Teams will incorporate some of the following possible components into their plans:
Residential Input from community leaders
Commercial and residents
Industrial Quality of Life
Recreation / Open Space Asset mapping
Mixed uses Leveraging location
Time Commitment:
Volunteer advisors are asked to be available on the following dates. For these all day program dates, volunteers would need to be available for approximately 5-6 hours:
• Neighborhood Day: Wednesday, April 1, 2009
• Charette: Wednesday, April 29, 2009
• Civic Vision: Thursday, May 28, 2009
Plus three (3) Saturday team meetings:
(2.5 – 3 hours long, times tbd) for additional time to help teams complete their projects.
We have scheduled these dates in advance, and the students are aware and required to attend:
• Sat., April 18, 2009
• Sat., May 9, 2009
• Sat., May 16, 2009"
Technical Advisor Info Sheet
Technical Advisor Interest Form
Those with urban planning, architecture or community leadership experience are asked to apply.
"Be a part of an exciting program! Look Up To Cleveland, a student leadership program, is seeking urban planners, architects and community leaders to serve as technical advisors to student teams.
NEEDED: Individuals with expertise or interest in community planning, architecture, urban design or other fields to volunteer their time and expertise as team advisors working with 17-18 high school juniors to develop goal-driven, civic vision plans for a designated Cleveland neighborhood. The high school students are enrolled in Look Up To Cleveland, a program for outstanding student leaders from public, private and parochial schools across Cuyahoga County.
Teams will incorporate some of the following possible components into their plans:
Residential Input from community leaders
Commercial and residents
Industrial Quality of Life
Recreation / Open Space Asset mapping
Mixed uses Leveraging location
Time Commitment:
Volunteer advisors are asked to be available on the following dates. For these all day program dates, volunteers would need to be available for approximately 5-6 hours:
• Neighborhood Day: Wednesday, April 1, 2009
• Charette: Wednesday, April 29, 2009
• Civic Vision: Thursday, May 28, 2009
Plus three (3) Saturday team meetings:
(2.5 – 3 hours long, times tbd) for additional time to help teams complete their projects.
We have scheduled these dates in advance, and the students are aware and required to attend:
• Sat., April 18, 2009
• Sat., May 9, 2009
• Sat., May 16, 2009"
Technical Advisor Info Sheet
Technical Advisor Interest Form
Saturday, February 21, 2009
a critical impasse of cynicism
It has been an abnormally tedious journey the last few months for someone interested in architecture, design, planning and the various aspects that can be considered simple accoutrements to existing in a city one attempts to care about.
The economic “shakedown” coupled with the already depressed local market has instigated an abnormal despondency towards optimistic planning which has been amplified through already mishandled large scale urban projects. Just going back a couple of years points at milestones made in Cleveland’s development that are contradictory to the general understanding of progress.
The botched County consolidation, which included the Ameritrust Tower weakened an already precipitous public trust towards elected officials (possibly magnified by discrepancies of character in regards to national politics). The project was not transparent enough, nor deemed necessary enough, to justify to the general public the scope and intent intended. I admit, my skepticism for the project holds strong and I still feel that the edifice to personal ego was greatly misplaced (via the proposed location) and squandered an amazing opportunity (to construct a marvel atop the stone base of the existing structure which some had intoned was the original plan).
On the other hand the Euclid Corridor project (which I will probably never call by the purchased “Health Line” name, it just sounds stupid to me) also suffers from a lack of understanding. That the majority of Federal funds went towards long overdue infrastructure improvements and not the actual bus line. This is important to understand for a number of reasons; the first being that the actual cost of the bus line itself was a small portion of the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure spine along Euclid. A cost that will no doubt be recouped when understood as preventative measures to counter possible failures (of power, water, sewer, etc.) and the monies necessary for the emergency repairs. Secondly it granted Cleveland a “premier” street (similar to a Main Street) which creates an inferred value and address of import for businesses to locate to. In fact, quite a few grand projects were planned before the mortgage crisis sunk our current banking system with the planned speculative projects in tow.
Now the cynicism that goes along with misunderstanding has found a “new” target, the planned location for the Medical Mart, a project that again has not been forthcoming enough to gain public support and will therefore squander the opportunity of the backing of the general public. Mention creating jobs downtown and heads nod, talk about bringing thousands of visitors to spend money and corners of lips start to twitch into low smiles, add that the plan includes attempting to beat New York City to market and hands start to wring together in joy but if one hides the details of the bargain (by not repeating it often and enough) people will start to question the ideology of an administration already suspect.
At the last public meeting regarding the Med Mart I saw quite a few familiar faces, those that hold the future of the city dear to heart and honestly want to rebuild the city’s image to one of a bright future, an urban wonder. I also saw some faces that I usually don’t at these meetings such as members of professional institutions who should be leveraging their skill sets towards creating a better project (and by extension better city). I left the meeting during the public comment portion, mostly because the questions that I felt were most necessary to understand to judge the merits of the project were bound to be asked in an incoherent and muddled way. The presentation itself was straight forward and actually gave enough reasons for my curiosity via the site selection to be sated. Whatever going ons I was not privy too were either concealed well enough under the presentation to not make a difference or did not hinder the choice enough to be considered “dealin’s”.
I will inquire (again) as to transparency. Where is all the information regarding the deal? Search for “Cleveland Medical Mart” and you end up with dozens of Plain Dealer reports with sporadic information (and enough public comment to make your head spin). The web sites and blogs that show up (official) do not contain any information and at the time of this writing the County website is down.
The interesting aspect of this condition, however, is that the answers are out there. I have seen online reports, proformas, cost calculations, estimations of income and various strategies for structuring the construction and operating costs and find some confusion as to why these reports are not centralized so as to be easily referenced. Now would be a pertinent (albeit late) time to collect and disseminate the information in order to garner public support. However the onus is not entirely only on the project. Those hoping to counter will do well to import research into their arguments as well. Anecdotal responses do very little to further the argument (except to reveal a misunderstanding of the precedence as well as the conversation at hand) except to attempt to personalize it. The “how does it directly affect me?” argument shouldn’t be the main concern, instead we should question “how does it immediately affect those around me, those I care about, those whom I have and share concern for?”.
As such I ran a very quick comparison between the physical location of convention centers in competing urban centers, Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Chicago, Detroit, Toronto (because I love Toronto) and Pittsburgh in an attempt to understand the correlation between the “assumed downtown center” and the convention center (as a case study for proximity and connectivity). Just a series of Google Maps represented that most of the convention centers are located relatively close to the center of “downtown” but not exactly, as they take up quite a bit of room (most of them are tucked to one side against a freeway or some other unbuildable area). What does this study show? Quite a bit if the proper questions are asked. How is the city connected to the convention hall? What amenities are nearby? How does this tie into the city as a whole? What is the correlation of public building to privately owned commercial structures? Then one can ask how many conventions are held each year, for how long, generating how much income? These are the sorts of studies that probably have been done (we would love to see them, to learn from them and point out congruencies and inconsistencies within the fabric of Cleveland). I mention this as an acceptable counter to the anecdotal information, my favorite so far being that a shopping mall in downtown Columbus is closed down for lack of use so how could a Convention Center in Cleveland succeed?
There is a time and place for unbridled cynicism. To be honest it is an easy way out of an argument, one you may not want to engage in simply because you fear what your own thoughts and opinions may reveal about yourself. I know I am guilty of throwing out the blanket statement of how everything in relation to the particular topic sucks. However the level of discourse that is being avoided may be the conversation most necessary to accept in order to exchange ideas and create solutions; which is where we with today’s problems of financial meltdown, environmental and social crisis, waning power supplies, exponential growth in technology (which may ironically be leading to more acceptable isolation).
We simply cannot afford knee jerk cynicism anymore, we require optimistic yet realistic solutions grounded in research, precedence and some expectation of altruism.
The economic “shakedown” coupled with the already depressed local market has instigated an abnormal despondency towards optimistic planning which has been amplified through already mishandled large scale urban projects. Just going back a couple of years points at milestones made in Cleveland’s development that are contradictory to the general understanding of progress.
The botched County consolidation, which included the Ameritrust Tower weakened an already precipitous public trust towards elected officials (possibly magnified by discrepancies of character in regards to national politics). The project was not transparent enough, nor deemed necessary enough, to justify to the general public the scope and intent intended. I admit, my skepticism for the project holds strong and I still feel that the edifice to personal ego was greatly misplaced (via the proposed location) and squandered an amazing opportunity (to construct a marvel atop the stone base of the existing structure which some had intoned was the original plan).
On the other hand the Euclid Corridor project (which I will probably never call by the purchased “Health Line” name, it just sounds stupid to me) also suffers from a lack of understanding. That the majority of Federal funds went towards long overdue infrastructure improvements and not the actual bus line. This is important to understand for a number of reasons; the first being that the actual cost of the bus line itself was a small portion of the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure spine along Euclid. A cost that will no doubt be recouped when understood as preventative measures to counter possible failures (of power, water, sewer, etc.) and the monies necessary for the emergency repairs. Secondly it granted Cleveland a “premier” street (similar to a Main Street) which creates an inferred value and address of import for businesses to locate to. In fact, quite a few grand projects were planned before the mortgage crisis sunk our current banking system with the planned speculative projects in tow.
Now the cynicism that goes along with misunderstanding has found a “new” target, the planned location for the Medical Mart, a project that again has not been forthcoming enough to gain public support and will therefore squander the opportunity of the backing of the general public. Mention creating jobs downtown and heads nod, talk about bringing thousands of visitors to spend money and corners of lips start to twitch into low smiles, add that the plan includes attempting to beat New York City to market and hands start to wring together in joy but if one hides the details of the bargain (by not repeating it often and enough) people will start to question the ideology of an administration already suspect.
At the last public meeting regarding the Med Mart I saw quite a few familiar faces, those that hold the future of the city dear to heart and honestly want to rebuild the city’s image to one of a bright future, an urban wonder. I also saw some faces that I usually don’t at these meetings such as members of professional institutions who should be leveraging their skill sets towards creating a better project (and by extension better city). I left the meeting during the public comment portion, mostly because the questions that I felt were most necessary to understand to judge the merits of the project were bound to be asked in an incoherent and muddled way. The presentation itself was straight forward and actually gave enough reasons for my curiosity via the site selection to be sated. Whatever going ons I was not privy too were either concealed well enough under the presentation to not make a difference or did not hinder the choice enough to be considered “dealin’s”.
I will inquire (again) as to transparency. Where is all the information regarding the deal? Search for “Cleveland Medical Mart” and you end up with dozens of Plain Dealer reports with sporadic information (and enough public comment to make your head spin). The web sites and blogs that show up (official) do not contain any information and at the time of this writing the County website is down.
The interesting aspect of this condition, however, is that the answers are out there. I have seen online reports, proformas, cost calculations, estimations of income and various strategies for structuring the construction and operating costs and find some confusion as to why these reports are not centralized so as to be easily referenced. Now would be a pertinent (albeit late) time to collect and disseminate the information in order to garner public support. However the onus is not entirely only on the project. Those hoping to counter will do well to import research into their arguments as well. Anecdotal responses do very little to further the argument (except to reveal a misunderstanding of the precedence as well as the conversation at hand) except to attempt to personalize it. The “how does it directly affect me?” argument shouldn’t be the main concern, instead we should question “how does it immediately affect those around me, those I care about, those whom I have and share concern for?”.
As such I ran a very quick comparison between the physical location of convention centers in competing urban centers, Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Chicago, Detroit, Toronto (because I love Toronto) and Pittsburgh in an attempt to understand the correlation between the “assumed downtown center” and the convention center (as a case study for proximity and connectivity). Just a series of Google Maps represented that most of the convention centers are located relatively close to the center of “downtown” but not exactly, as they take up quite a bit of room (most of them are tucked to one side against a freeway or some other unbuildable area). What does this study show? Quite a bit if the proper questions are asked. How is the city connected to the convention hall? What amenities are nearby? How does this tie into the city as a whole? What is the correlation of public building to privately owned commercial structures? Then one can ask how many conventions are held each year, for how long, generating how much income? These are the sorts of studies that probably have been done (we would love to see them, to learn from them and point out congruencies and inconsistencies within the fabric of Cleveland). I mention this as an acceptable counter to the anecdotal information, my favorite so far being that a shopping mall in downtown Columbus is closed down for lack of use so how could a Convention Center in Cleveland succeed?
There is a time and place for unbridled cynicism. To be honest it is an easy way out of an argument, one you may not want to engage in simply because you fear what your own thoughts and opinions may reveal about yourself. I know I am guilty of throwing out the blanket statement of how everything in relation to the particular topic sucks. However the level of discourse that is being avoided may be the conversation most necessary to accept in order to exchange ideas and create solutions; which is where we with today’s problems of financial meltdown, environmental and social crisis, waning power supplies, exponential growth in technology (which may ironically be leading to more acceptable isolation).
We simply cannot afford knee jerk cynicism anymore, we require optimistic yet realistic solutions grounded in research, precedence and some expectation of altruism.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Tremont Art Walk - February 2009
Tremont Art Walk
Friday, February 13, 2009
Tremont neighborhood of Cleveland Ohio, 44113
6-10pm
- four roses :: print by Beth Mastroianni
resources:
Tremont Art Walk website
Google Map it
ArtWalk Map
Friday, February 13, 2009
Tremont neighborhood of Cleveland Ohio, 44113
6-10pm
- four roses :: print by Beth MastroianniTremont Art Walk website
Google Map it
ArtWalk Map
Saturday, February 07, 2009
the seasons of Cleveland
The sun is out and Cleveland starts to awaken from its cold slumber. I just wanted to share some photos from Lakewood Park I took today of Lake Erie slowly melting. There is something nice about the change of the seasons (especially as I have already grown sick of shoveling and attempting to commute to work in winter traffic) and the elongating day.We still have plenty of winter left so don't get out the shorts just yet.
However take whatever time you can to enjoy the recent warm up. It is a perfect opportunity to wander around and reintroduce yourself to your neighborhood and our fair city.
Medical Mart Site Selection Public Meeting - will anyone show up to the party?
What: Public Hearing Regarding the Cleveland Medical Mart and Convention Center Site Selection
When: Thursday, February 12th, 2009
2pm
Where: Cleveland Public Library 325 Superior Ave., Cleveland, Ohio
Weeks after the decision to select the Mall Site as the primary location (dependent upon foundation and further cost analysis) the County Commissioners (selection board) will hold a public meeting with MMPI (Merchandise Mart Properties, Inc.). Present at the meeting will be the documentation that was presented to the various selection committee members which positioned the Mall Site as the premier location.
The official stand on the meeting is interesting. Jim McCafferty stated on an interview with WCPN that the public meeting is not in response to public outcry but instead was planned all along. It doesn't really matter to me if it is in response or not, in fact, I almost would rather that the meeting was a direct reaction in attempting to involve the heightened tone of the public in what could be the largest civic project this decade.
Regardless, the public meeting is a go and now the burden is on those vocal public groups to show up, take the time to disseminate the distributed information and offer thoughtful and direct comments.
I suppose I can admit that I am interested in the event and hope that certain specific milestones occur:
See you on Thursday.
cite yer source: WCPN
more fun:
Medical Mart Project blog hasn't been updated since Dec. 2007.
Cleveland Merchandise Mart "official website" - soon with content?
MMPI Chicago Merchandise Mart
When: Thursday, February 12th, 2009
2pm
Where: Cleveland Public Library 325 Superior Ave., Cleveland, Ohio
Weeks after the decision to select the Mall Site as the primary location (dependent upon foundation and further cost analysis) the County Commissioners (selection board) will hold a public meeting with MMPI (Merchandise Mart Properties, Inc.). Present at the meeting will be the documentation that was presented to the various selection committee members which positioned the Mall Site as the premier location.
The official stand on the meeting is interesting. Jim McCafferty stated on an interview with WCPN that the public meeting is not in response to public outcry but instead was planned all along. It doesn't really matter to me if it is in response or not, in fact, I almost would rather that the meeting was a direct reaction in attempting to involve the heightened tone of the public in what could be the largest civic project this decade.
Regardless, the public meeting is a go and now the burden is on those vocal public groups to show up, take the time to disseminate the distributed information and offer thoughtful and direct comments.
I suppose I can admit that I am interested in the event and hope that certain specific milestones occur:
- The information disseminated is legible, laid out in an intelligent and understandable order and made available via handouts or web access both previous to the meeting and after.
- That public commentary is limited to the task at hand and not to grind personal axes about which political party is doing what or who is in who's pocket. Comments that question cost estimations, building technique, proposed growth and expansion plans, tax income, maintenance, public use, etc should all be welcome and directly answered.
- That representatives of involved professional communities such as Cleveland AIA or NSPE are on hand to take part in the meeting, gather information on the public's reaction and offer insight from a professional standpoint.
- That intelligent questions are respected and if direct answers cannot be given because the information is not at hand then requested information will be released at a later date (not too late).
See you on Thursday.
cite yer source: WCPN
more fun:
Medical Mart Project blog hasn't been updated since Dec. 2007.
Cleveland Merchandise Mart "official website" - soon with content?
MMPI Chicago Merchandise Mart
Thursday, January 29, 2009
2009 Open Architecture Challenge: Classroom
"Design the classroom of the future"
TODAY'S LESSON: BETTER CLASSROOM DESIGN
The 2009 Open Architecture Challenge invites students, teachers and designers to work together to design the classroom of the future. Design teams are can partner with a school of their choosing or with one of our school building partners below.
Partner with a school of your choice
Urban Classroom Upgrade (India)
Relocatable Classroom Design (Modular)
Rural Classroom Addition (Uganda)
Teachers and students know what makes a classroom work. We're inviting you to design the classroom of the future together.
According to the World Bank, educating all children worldwide will require the construction of 10 million new classrooms in more than 100 countries by 2015. At the same time, millions of existing classrooms are in serious need of repair and refurbishment.
Let's get started.
We are inviting you, the designer, to work with students and teachers to design the classroom of the future for a school of your choosing. Your design should address the unique challenges your school faces in trying to provide smart, safe and sustainable learning spaces. Students and teachers, here's your chance to tell the world what you need to make your classroom more effective. Architects and designers, you'll work one-on-one with students to translate those needs into better classroom design.
* Share your design expertise and inspire school students to re-imagine their classroom
* Help students learn about the built environment using a companion design curriculum
* Become an advocate for better classroom design in your community
Jurors currently includes Dave Eggers, Michelle Kaufmann, Hilary Cottam, Kigge Hvid and others. More will be added over the course of the registration period.
If your design wins, your school will receive up to $50,000 in funding for classroom construction and upgrading. You will receive a grant of $5,000 to help them do it.
How to Get Involved
All are welcome to participate. You do not need to be a registered architect. You may submit multiple entries. There is an entry fee of $25 per entry. (These fees go towards supporting the competition. Fees are waived for entrants from developing nations).
| Design Teams |
|---|
Once you have registered, you will have access to your project page and specific competition brief and criteria. |
| Teachers and Students |
|
If you are not already a member, you must first join the Open Architecture Network to enter the competition. Joining is free and only takes a moment. Register to join the Open Architecture Network.
2009 Open Architecture ChallengeOAN register
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Pecha Kucha Night Cleveland #2
Friday, February 6th, 2009
Start 8:20pm (doors open at 7)
House of Blues
308 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
Please join us at PechaKucha Night Cleveland - Volume 2, as local creatives present their work, ideas, and obsessions in a series of short presentations on art, fashion, food, architecture, film, furniture, music, and photography. Space will be tight so be sure to come early and enjoy a few beverages prior to being inspired, influenced, confused, provoked, and probably slightly intoxicated by the wonderfully variegated topic mix. Doors and bar open at 7:00pm. Keep an eye on the list of presenters - we will be updating it over the next few weeks. If you are interesting in presenting at a future PechaKucha Night, have an idea for a venue, or have questions about PechaKucha Night, please contact us - we'd love to hear your ideas. Can't wait to see ya on the 6th.
Be sure to bring a friend or two! Cheers, Mike Christoff & Raseem Parker pkncleveland@gmail.com
resources:
Pecha Kucha Night Cleveland
Start 8:20pm (doors open at 7)
House of Blues
308 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
Please join us at PechaKucha Night Cleveland - Volume 2, as local creatives present their work, ideas, and obsessions in a series of short presentations on art, fashion, food, architecture, film, furniture, music, and photography. Space will be tight so be sure to come early and enjoy a few beverages prior to being inspired, influenced, confused, provoked, and probably slightly intoxicated by the wonderfully variegated topic mix. Doors and bar open at 7:00pm. Keep an eye on the list of presenters - we will be updating it over the next few weeks. If you are interesting in presenting at a future PechaKucha Night, have an idea for a venue, or have questions about PechaKucha Night, please contact us - we'd love to hear your ideas. Can't wait to see ya on the 6th.
Be sure to bring a friend or two! Cheers, Mike Christoff & Raseem Parker pkncleveland@gmail.com
resources:
Pecha Kucha Night Cleveland
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Med Mart/Convention Center as case study for growing Cleveland
Perhaps it requires the diligence of an unconnected outsider to muddle through the necessary logic and intent to chose a proper siting for a large project for this (and perhaps any) city. No one can fault Forest City for wanting to capitalize on underused properties. In fact the arguments which centered on the connectivity of the site were understandably strong however the proximity of the Mall site (.4 miles, 6 minutes walk by indirect path from Tower City) makes locating the new convention center and adjacent mart based upon "connectivity" alone one difficult to argue. I would like to see the Cuyahoga River developed (not in the fashion of creating large, imposing cliffs of "architecture" along it as shown by the Tower City Proposal), in fact I would rather see Riverfront Development take precedence over any lakefront development as the Cuyahoga is distinctly Cleveland and sets us apart historically and allegorically from any other competiting city.
While the plan of using the new convention center/medical mart as an impetus to invigorate seemingly unrelated industries is honestly overreaching the intent of developing the necessary entertainment/hotel industry to support conventions will set aside the chicken/egg argument (between residential program and its necessary supportive infrastructure) by first strengthening Cleveland as a destination and hopefully providing the necessary infrastructure (transit/entertainment/lodging) that will then allow an increase in desirability for residents and increase Cleveland's population strengthening tax base and enlivening the city
The site has finally been chosen, one I personally endorse and think was the better decision. Situated in a more public location with access to public transit, Burke Lakefront Airport and our burgeoning passenger rail (yes, the Amtrak station that most Clevelander's understandably couldn't find on a map is to the north of the Mall Site - hint follow the tracks) the proposed site is part of Cleveland's Group Plan developed by Arnold Brunner, John M. Carrère and Daniel Burnham with the intent to create a grand civic space for the "progressive city of Cleveland".
The next steps will seem both stubbornly slow and uncomfortably rapid as spatial and formal programs are developed and studied, connections to existing districts/regions are studied and strengthened and as funding is arranged and dispersed. My excitement at the project is not limited to simple site selection. I will not agree that this project alone can save the city but I do feel that it will reinforce what we already have and create job opportunity that we can harness and evolve into a more educated workforce backed by specialized manufacturing.
I beg that vigilant attention be paid to the project, to keep transparency high, to keep decisions informed and to make accountability for success or failure possible. This is a great case study for our city, one with tendrils further reaching and more permanent than the entertainment complexes of stadiums and arenas, one that can capitalize upon public spaces and movement to create an integrated and succinct solution that can become a strong positive image for our city; because in the end to succeed that is what the new Medical Mart and Convention Center has to become, a strong positive image that can impress upon the large volume of visitors that will be attending these functions. So that we (Cleveland) can make the flourish and statement of a city rising back up to reclaim its older glory of a vibrant metropolis, an exciting place to live, a fruitful place to work and a grand address to locate a business or industry.
resources:
Cleveland's Group Plan - Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on City Planning, Cleveland, June 5-7, 1916 - a surprisingly still relevant read.
While the plan of using the new convention center/medical mart as an impetus to invigorate seemingly unrelated industries is honestly overreaching the intent of developing the necessary entertainment/hotel industry to support conventions will set aside the chicken/egg argument (between residential program and its necessary supportive infrastructure) by first strengthening Cleveland as a destination and hopefully providing the necessary infrastructure (transit/entertainment/lodging) that will then allow an increase in desirability for residents and increase Cleveland's population strengthening tax base and enlivening the city
The site has finally been chosen, one I personally endorse and think was the better decision. Situated in a more public location with access to public transit, Burke Lakefront Airport and our burgeoning passenger rail (yes, the Amtrak station that most Clevelander's understandably couldn't find on a map is to the north of the Mall Site - hint follow the tracks) the proposed site is part of Cleveland's Group Plan developed by Arnold Brunner, John M. Carrère and Daniel Burnham with the intent to create a grand civic space for the "progressive city of Cleveland".
The next steps will seem both stubbornly slow and uncomfortably rapid as spatial and formal programs are developed and studied, connections to existing districts/regions are studied and strengthened and as funding is arranged and dispersed. My excitement at the project is not limited to simple site selection. I will not agree that this project alone can save the city but I do feel that it will reinforce what we already have and create job opportunity that we can harness and evolve into a more educated workforce backed by specialized manufacturing.
I beg that vigilant attention be paid to the project, to keep transparency high, to keep decisions informed and to make accountability for success or failure possible. This is a great case study for our city, one with tendrils further reaching and more permanent than the entertainment complexes of stadiums and arenas, one that can capitalize upon public spaces and movement to create an integrated and succinct solution that can become a strong positive image for our city; because in the end to succeed that is what the new Medical Mart and Convention Center has to become, a strong positive image that can impress upon the large volume of visitors that will be attending these functions. So that we (Cleveland) can make the flourish and statement of a city rising back up to reclaim its older glory of a vibrant metropolis, an exciting place to live, a fruitful place to work and a grand address to locate a business or industry.
resources:
Cleveland's Group Plan - Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on City Planning, Cleveland, June 5-7, 1916 - a surprisingly still relevant read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)