resources:CUDC posting
Workshop RSVP
Location Map
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
This Mon. 3/22, 6:30pm, City Hall: Rally for I-90 bridge Access For All
From a recently received email that I felt I should pass along:
As many of you know, OCBC is expressly NOT and advocacy organization. Since our mission is to "help people use bicycles," though, it would be shortsighted for us not to support this public infrastructure issue that has such important practical and safety implications for cyclists. I hope you will consider the information presented in the links below and at this event; and if you agree, please forward this notice to others.If you plan to attend, you can meet at OCBC at 6pm and ride to City Hall with a group. Loaner bikes and helmets are available (please reply or call if you need one). If you need to drive, on-street (metered) parking is free after 6:30 downtown. If you plan to attend the Council meeting, you'll need a photo ID to enter City Hall.
I welcome your thoughts on this issue, and OCBC's support of it, whatever your opinion.
Respectfully,
Jim Sheehan,
OCBC director
Please join the last, best, chance to win bike/pedestrian access on the new I-90 bridge!
At a citizen's rally this Monday, March 22nd at 6:30pm on the steps of Cleveland City Hall, every additional person can have a big impact in support of a well-designed, safe, separated lane for cyclists and pedestrians on the new I-90 innerbelt bridge -- and on the future of equitable treatment for "alternative transportation" in our region, and in our State.
There are three objectives for this rally:
1. Immediately after the rally, citizens will attend the 7pm City Council meetingwhere a resolution is expected to be introduced expressing Council's desire for an additional "design alternative" for bike and pedestrian access on the bridge, similar to that passed by the Cleveland Planning Commission on January 22nd 2010. Though Council does not usually accept public comment on its resolutions, a large presence of citizens in support of this resolution will have an strong effect, especially as it could be passed immediately, under suspension of procedural rules requiring prior committee review, if enough Council members are present.
2. On Tuesday, March 23rd, ODOT (the Ohio Department of Transportation) will announce the three finalist Design-Build Teams (DBTs), who will each be paid $1 million to prepare, by August 5th, 30% complete design plans for the bridge. ODOT will then choose the final contracting team from among these three DBT's, and will be able to incorporate designs from any of the three finalists in their specifications. ODOT has been requested to simply add an "addendum" to their instructions to the DBT's allowing them to design accommodations for cyclists and pedestrians on the bridge itself, as an additional "design alternative" to ODOT's planned accommodations on Abbey Avenue and the Hope Memorial bridges (all federally-funded road projects are required to give reasonable consideration to cyclist and pedestrians' needs).
At the rally, citizens will be asking the Design-Build Teams to include non-motorized access to the bridge as a design alternative whether ODOT includes it as an addendum or not: mounting popular and political pressure make it likely that this facility will eventually be included, and the DBTs can show responsible stewardship of taxpayer's money by designing it in the 30% design phase, so it does not need to be added in the later, less-flexible, contractor design process.
3. Strong popular support is needed now to show ODOT, our political leaders, and the press that this issue is not going away. There are many reasons why this facility is good for Cleveland, the region, and the country. More than 30 other cities in the U.S. have gotten space for non-motorized users on interstate freeway bridges, but, despite years of proper, official public comment; reasonable and professional design suggestions; and several recent months of advocates' hard work in the press and with politicians, ODOT still refuses to consider this sensible, economical feature in its reconstruction of one of Cleveland's main arteries.
Adding an exceptional showing of public enthusiasm, and Council's formal support, to that of the Cleveland Planning Commission, Governor Strickland, Senator Sherrod Brown, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, the Plain Dealer, and scores of local businesses and civic organizations -- and doing so before the DBTs begin their design work -- may be the last best chance to make this good idea a reality without the risk of delaying the much-needed replacement of this bridge. Elsewhere, bike/ped access has been added to similar projects after the 90% design stage. ODOT should not wait that long.
There will be public "involvement" meetings during the design-build process about minor aesthetic design features, but this is the last, best, chance for the public to speak up forcefully in support of equal access for all citizens to this $450 million bridge that we all are paying for. This should be a bridge for all -- for people in cars, trucks and busses; but also for those who don't own a car, who choose not to drive everywhere, or who just want to walk or bike between Tremont and Downtown for their health, for the great view, or for a change.
For more information about this issue see www.gcbl.org/innerbelt
Thanks for considering this invitation on such short notice; I hope to see you there.
Jim
At a citizen's rally this Monday, March 22nd at 6:30pm on the steps of Cleveland City Hall, every additional person can have a big impact in support of a well-designed, safe, separated lane for cyclists and pedestrians on the new I-90 innerbelt bridge -- and on the future of equitable treatment for "alternative transportation" in our region, and in our State.
There are three objectives for this rally:
1. Immediately after the rally, citizens will attend the 7pm City Council meetingwhere a resolution is expected to be introduced expressing Council's desire for an additional "design alternative" for bike and pedestrian access on the bridge, similar to that passed by the Cleveland Planning Commission on January 22nd 2010. Though Council does not usually accept public comment on its resolutions, a large presence of citizens in support of this resolution will have an strong effect, especially as it could be passed immediately, under suspension of procedural rules requiring prior committee review, if enough Council members are present.
2. On Tuesday, March 23rd, ODOT (the Ohio Department of Transportation) will announce the three finalist Design-Build Teams (DBTs), who will each be paid $1 million to prepare, by August 5th, 30% complete design plans for the bridge. ODOT will then choose the final contracting team from among these three DBT's, and will be able to incorporate designs from any of the three finalists in their specifications. ODOT has been requested to simply add an "addendum" to their instructions to the DBT's allowing them to design accommodations for cyclists and pedestrians on the bridge itself, as an additional "design alternative" to ODOT's planned accommodations on Abbey Avenue and the Hope Memorial bridges (all federally-funded road projects are required to give reasonable consideration to cyclist and pedestrians' needs).
At the rally, citizens will be asking the Design-Build Teams to include non-motorized access to the bridge as a design alternative whether ODOT includes it as an addendum or not: mounting popular and political pressure make it likely that this facility will eventually be included, and the DBTs can show responsible stewardship of taxpayer's money by designing it in the 30% design phase, so it does not need to be added in the later, less-flexible, contractor design process.
3. Strong popular support is needed now to show ODOT, our political leaders, and the press that this issue is not going away. There are many reasons why this facility is good for Cleveland, the region, and the country. More than 30 other cities in the U.S. have gotten space for non-motorized users on interstate freeway bridges, but, despite years of proper, official public comment; reasonable and professional design suggestions; and several recent months of advocates' hard work in the press and with politicians, ODOT still refuses to consider this sensible, economical feature in its reconstruction of one of Cleveland's main arteries.
Adding an exceptional showing of public enthusiasm, and Council's formal support, to that of the Cleveland Planning Commission, Governor Strickland, Senator Sherrod Brown, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, the Plain Dealer, and scores of local businesses and civic organizations -- and doing so before the DBTs begin their design work -- may be the last best chance to make this good idea a reality without the risk of delaying the much-needed replacement of this bridge. Elsewhere, bike/ped access has been added to similar projects after the 90% design stage. ODOT should not wait that long.
There will be public "involvement" meetings during the design-build process about minor aesthetic design features, but this is the last, best, chance for the public to speak up forcefully in support of equal access for all citizens to this $450 million bridge that we all are paying for. This should be a bridge for all -- for people in cars, trucks and busses; but also for those who don't own a car, who choose not to drive everywhere, or who just want to walk or bike between Tremont and Downtown for their health, for the great view, or for a change.
For more information about this issue see www.gcbl.org/innerbelt
Thanks for considering this invitation on such short notice; I hope to see you there.
Jim
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://toistudio.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://toistudio.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
James Howard Kunstler @ Cleveland Public Library March 14th
325 Superior Ave. N.E.
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Sunday, March 14th, 2010
2pm
An author, journalist, and urban planning expert, James Howard Kunstler is one of the foremost social critics of our time. The Geography of Nowhere (1993) and Home from Nowhere (1996) established him as a fierce critic of suburban sprawl and the high cost of our automobile-dependant culture.
His bestselling book, The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging Catastrophes of the 21st Century (2005) addressed the ongoing global oil crisis by exploring the sweeping economic, political and societal changes that will result from the inevitable end of access to cheap fossil fuels. He expanded on his previous criticisms and detailed the impact the crisis will have on the way we live, work, farm and build.
The 2008 publication of his 10th novel, World Made by Hand, placed those ideas and his critique in a provocative fictional setting. Given the wild fluctuations in prices and concerns over the world’s oil supply, World Made by Hand is both timely and portentous. Through the eyes of the citizens and mayor of Union Grove, Kunstler imagines what will happen in Small Town USA when the oil wells dry up, the climate changes, and the economic system collapses. While it is “grim with portent,” the San Francisco Chronicle said, World Made by Hand “is an impassioned and invigorating tale whose ultimate message is one of hope, not despair.”
Kunstler’s earlier novels include Maggie Darling (2004), Thunder Island(1989), The Halloween Ball (1987), An Embarrassment of Riches (1985), andThe Life of Byron Janes (1983).
A former staff writer for Rolling Stone, he continues to be a prolific journalist and essayist whose writings have appeared in The Atlantic Monthly, Orion Magazine, The New York Times Sunday Magazine and on Slate.com.
A native New Yorker, he resides in Saratoga Springs.
Monday, March 08, 2010
Towpath Trail Open House - March 9th
Towpath Trail Open House
Tuesday, March 9th, 4:30-7:30pm
St. Joseph / OLA Center
2346 West 14th Street in Tremont
Please join the Towpath Trail Partnership Committee and Michael Baker Engineering, consultants for Phase 3 design and engineering for our second public Towpath Trail Open House. They will share a preferred Towpath Trail route alternative, provide land use scenarios for the accompanying greenway and introduce interpretive themes and settings.
Come. Let them know what you think. Give them your questions and concerns. Tell them what you favor.
While we are away
TOIstudio bloggerness is currently undergoing a transitional system change. Google (who we all love here and promise our undying affection) is removing FTP ability meaning that this blog will soon have to be hosted on Google's webbernet sites unless a different interface system is used.
We are currently trying to work out the bugs in the various systems to make a final decision and hope to be back up shortly.
We know everyone has been extremely concerned. Please take this absence as no indication of any opinion that Cleveland has already destroyed our hope, soul, good nature, willingness to expect change, love, affection, joy, ability to dream or mental stability. The sun is out, the weather is getting nicer and once this dang chest cold goes away I expect to once again be a bouncing example of overabundant exuberance.
In the meanwhile TOIstudio headquarters is full of interweb code and related hijinks in an effort to bring you, our valued reader(s?) the best quality architecture thought and opinion directly South of Lake Erie and North of 480.
We appreciate your understanding.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Brite Winter Festival
Italian goodness and adult sodas, courtesy of Louie at Sainato’s Restaurant
Soup, sweets, and soothing hot drinks, courtesy of our sponsor Gypsy Bean Coffee and Baking
Music
a DJ will set the mood
The Hot Rails : “the penultimate 70s hard rock band”
Uncanny Xe La : Soul/Jazz/Dub Quintet
This Moment in Black History : “Once you label me, you negate me”
Art
Austin Kotting – Kent State University – subjective cartography, aka “You Are Here.”
Gauri Torgalkar and David Jurca – Pop Up City – PopUp-BlowUp Chill Domes. Your one and only chance to listen to music or play ice bocce ball in a room made out of sheet plastic and duct tape.
Other artist info under Art Tag at top of page
Activities
Bonfires: chill out and stay warm
Cornhole: not just for tailgating and picnics anymore. Organized by Cleveland Plays.
Giant “skeeball”: Chuck E Cheese for big kids. We hope we can pull this one off.
Ice bocce ball = water + spherical molds + freeze + Italian tradition
Chalkboard graffiti: self-expression strongly encouraged
Bridge War reenactment: East Side vs. West Side, courtesy of Mother Nature, snowballs, and wacky Cleveland history
Afterparty: Mulberry’s Bar. Activities, karoke, drinks, and extended fun.
For more detail, click on “Schedule” tab.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Ohio's 3C plan, lack of bold vision posistions plan for eventual failure
I love trains. I am a complete sucker for convenient rail travel. When ever anyone asks I feel the urge to gush forward on the amazing journey I had from Akron to Milwaukee back in 2001/2002. The seat was wide and reclined so nicely that catching a train at some ungodly and chilly morning hour didn't bother me so much. I was on a mission, to see the land that Pabst created, it was a holy crusade of sorts and I wasn't going to let something as trivial as a logical or convenient timetable get in my way. Of course my ever trusty VW Polo (called a Fox in these here states) was in a constant state of disrepair as undergraduate school meant funds were allocated towards, lets say social gathering research, rather then personal transportation.
With eager ears I awaited the news of Ohio's 3C corridor "high speed" rail plan. Who wouldn't? I am extremely excited about taking the train to OSU or Cincy to catch some of the amazing architecture lectures available for public attendance at those fine institutions. It isn't that I don't enjoy driving, I just don't like the vast majority of other people on the road. Going slow in the high speed lane, not using blinkers, not letting anyone merge so a complete and utter clusterf@*k occurs slowing EVERYONE down, etc. I would rather sit comfortably in my oversized reclining chair, listening to something drone on the headset and watch the Midwest do what it does best, roll gently by a window. Heck, I could even read a book or trade magazine, perhaps do some writing. At the very least I could be mildly productive which for the 3 hour trip is roughly 1/6 of my waking time that day (one way).
Of course that only makes sense if I can get back at a reasonable hour. The timetables so far suggested infer that if I were to catch a lecture at Knowlton School of Architecture at OSU, which are mostly in the early evening (say 6pm for this example), I would have to catch the 6am train. 3 hours of travel mean I arrive in Columbus fresh and ready to learn by 9am which is perfect if I had a morning meeting, which I probably wouldn't. That would leave roughly 9 hours to explore Columbus, without a car, which would probably be interesting once (not to be cruel but I honestly would spend most of the time fretting about getting to the lecture on time). Somewhere in there I would have to spend more money to get to the lecture. Fine. So say the lecture is amazing and ends at 8pm with a rather invigorating Q&A session. I grab a couple of drinks to digest and start thinking about how to get home.
I have to then wait in Columbus for 19 more hours as the return train to Cleveland doesn't depart until 3pm.
There is the flaw in the plan. The limited schedule makes me question who the target demographic for the system is. I have no problem if my plan is to catch an exhibit at museum or even perhaps a late morning to early afternoon meeting (although giving up my whole day for a single meeting due to train schedule is asking a bit much, it better be an amazing meeting, with doughnuts and really good coffee and boxed lunch) but there is very limited availability to say catch a college football game at OSU (I hear they have a team) or a concert or do any of the other tens of things that tourists want to do. I would argue that the train line is more work/commuter oriented but if that were the case a line from Cleveland to Akron would a tad more sense, running from 7 am and again at 7 pm.
Or course this proposed schedule is just the beginning, proposed schedule, all aspects subject to change, nothing in stone, we don't even know what trains will run on the tracks but I want the system to succeed dammit. I want to be able to take a train to Philly and Toronto and New York. I don't want to depend on my car more than I have to (I still don't even like owning one actually but working in Cleveland, especially when one has to visit job sites makes that extremely difficult). I want to not even have to plan that far in advance. I would love to just realize that it is Saturday morning, grab the MarJ and hop a line to, I don't know, Chicago, for the day. Have our fun and catch a train back, sleeping on the return trip so we can reasonably enjoy the rest of the weekend. I don't even mind if the commute is slightly more time consuming than driving (thinking of the time saved trying to find parking, also being able to converse with someone without having to half wonder if the Chucklehead in the Explorer is meaning to be in your lane or the lane next to you as he wanders about in a self absorbed stupor).
It all seems so very sensible if done correctly. Or half correctly. The one thing we cannot have at this juncture is the possibility of implementing a system that could for all wants and purposes alter our society's way of moving about, paid for with our taxes, designed for users that really don't exist. We need a more cohesive schedule to allow movement back and forth for tourists, sports fans, urban explorers and business people in a timely and realistic manner. If it means that more trains have to added and costs per ride have to increase slightly then be it. I would rather the system be a more expensive realistic option then one that I can't possibly use.
And yes this is all about me. I want this project to succeed more than anything in the region right now. I think this could make Cleveland a much more fantastic city then developing the waterfront or putting in a med mart or redesigning public square or even connecting the East and West side with bike access to a major bridge project (although, that one should be a gimme), as it would connect this city to the rest of the nation in a cheap and effective manner. I cannot, however, understand the logic behind the current planning/schedule and that annoys the heck out of me.
resources:
WCPN 2010.02.02 Sound of Ideas
Access for All music video
With eager ears I awaited the news of Ohio's 3C corridor "high speed" rail plan. Who wouldn't? I am extremely excited about taking the train to OSU or Cincy to catch some of the amazing architecture lectures available for public attendance at those fine institutions. It isn't that I don't enjoy driving, I just don't like the vast majority of other people on the road. Going slow in the high speed lane, not using blinkers, not letting anyone merge so a complete and utter clusterf@*k occurs slowing EVERYONE down, etc. I would rather sit comfortably in my oversized reclining chair, listening to something drone on the headset and watch the Midwest do what it does best, roll gently by a window. Heck, I could even read a book or trade magazine, perhaps do some writing. At the very least I could be mildly productive which for the 3 hour trip is roughly 1/6 of my waking time that day (one way).
Of course that only makes sense if I can get back at a reasonable hour. The timetables so far suggested infer that if I were to catch a lecture at Knowlton School of Architecture at OSU, which are mostly in the early evening (say 6pm for this example), I would have to catch the 6am train. 3 hours of travel mean I arrive in Columbus fresh and ready to learn by 9am which is perfect if I had a morning meeting, which I probably wouldn't. That would leave roughly 9 hours to explore Columbus, without a car, which would probably be interesting once (not to be cruel but I honestly would spend most of the time fretting about getting to the lecture on time). Somewhere in there I would have to spend more money to get to the lecture. Fine. So say the lecture is amazing and ends at 8pm with a rather invigorating Q&A session. I grab a couple of drinks to digest and start thinking about how to get home.
I have to then wait in Columbus for 19 more hours as the return train to Cleveland doesn't depart until 3pm.
There is the flaw in the plan. The limited schedule makes me question who the target demographic for the system is. I have no problem if my plan is to catch an exhibit at museum or even perhaps a late morning to early afternoon meeting (although giving up my whole day for a single meeting due to train schedule is asking a bit much, it better be an amazing meeting, with doughnuts and really good coffee and boxed lunch) but there is very limited availability to say catch a college football game at OSU (I hear they have a team) or a concert or do any of the other tens of things that tourists want to do. I would argue that the train line is more work/commuter oriented but if that were the case a line from Cleveland to Akron would a tad more sense, running from 7 am and again at 7 pm.
Or course this proposed schedule is just the beginning, proposed schedule, all aspects subject to change, nothing in stone, we don't even know what trains will run on the tracks but I want the system to succeed dammit. I want to be able to take a train to Philly and Toronto and New York. I don't want to depend on my car more than I have to (I still don't even like owning one actually but working in Cleveland, especially when one has to visit job sites makes that extremely difficult). I want to not even have to plan that far in advance. I would love to just realize that it is Saturday morning, grab the MarJ and hop a line to, I don't know, Chicago, for the day. Have our fun and catch a train back, sleeping on the return trip so we can reasonably enjoy the rest of the weekend. I don't even mind if the commute is slightly more time consuming than driving (thinking of the time saved trying to find parking, also being able to converse with someone without having to half wonder if the Chucklehead in the Explorer is meaning to be in your lane or the lane next to you as he wanders about in a self absorbed stupor).
It all seems so very sensible if done correctly. Or half correctly. The one thing we cannot have at this juncture is the possibility of implementing a system that could for all wants and purposes alter our society's way of moving about, paid for with our taxes, designed for users that really don't exist. We need a more cohesive schedule to allow movement back and forth for tourists, sports fans, urban explorers and business people in a timely and realistic manner. If it means that more trains have to added and costs per ride have to increase slightly then be it. I would rather the system be a more expensive realistic option then one that I can't possibly use.
And yes this is all about me. I want this project to succeed more than anything in the region right now. I think this could make Cleveland a much more fantastic city then developing the waterfront or putting in a med mart or redesigning public square or even connecting the East and West side with bike access to a major bridge project (although, that one should be a gimme), as it would connect this city to the rest of the nation in a cheap and effective manner. I cannot, however, understand the logic behind the current planning/schedule and that annoys the heck out of me.
resources:
WCPN 2010.02.02 Sound of Ideas
Access for All music video
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Transmaterial 3: Blaine Brownell
Now in its third edition the physical manifestation of the popular Transmaterial webblog has recently been released by the publisher and is now available at your book outlet of choice. Mine arrived from Amazon Monday (to my surprise, I pre-ordered and completely lost track of time).
For those of you not familiar with Mr. Brownell or Transmaterial the work aggregated and researched by Mr. Brownell typically is in response to the desire of the materiality of design, either through expressive/communicative, performance or efficiency characteristics studied through the Transstudio research and design group. Mr. Brownell current teaches at the University of Minnesota and is an avid research/writer and lecturer.
A guide such as Transmaterial fulfills two of the most necessary components of creating a built environment, the proffering of materials to fulfill required tasks (not easily obtainable by "standard" materials) and by constantly demonstrating the continuous research and development of new materials from which to design, build and aspire. Granted many of the materials illustrated in the Transmaterial books are not necessarily affordable (see cheap when compared to existing materials) however they are not meant as simple replacement for existing systems but marked improvements in performance, environmental consideration (footprint) and customability/usability. I was extremely pleased to discover just how many of the materials in the book were being developed by companies in the United States (easing access) and have already begun book marking pages for my wish list to someday see available in Cleveland (or where ever I end up doing whatever I am doing).
In more than one way the book is fabulous design porn. Materials are organized by material makeup (concrete, wood, metal, etc.), complete with thumbnail images, brief descriptions of material contents, applications, types/sizes, environmental concerns/benefits, testing/examination certificates, product limitation and the ever important manufacturing contact to find if the product is indeed available in your project's area.
At the very least it is fantastic to see what new materials are being made available for use and may even help in one's own development of project design through materiality, which makes the book well worth the purchase price in itself.
Transmaterial also offers a weekly email subscription of new materials. Granted the materials you receive are typically also showcased in the following book release, however the book contains over 200 products which is more than you would have access to via email along, you also get a rather nice bit of reading material that you can mark up and book mark for future reference.
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Tonight's Lecture, Elena Manferdini, is Postponed - Kent State CAED
Tonight's Lecture, Elena Manferdini, is Postponed.
Due to weather, Elena Manferdini's flight has been cancelled. This lecture will be rescheduled in the future. Please check our webpage & events section of the E-News for updates on this event. Thanks.
Pecha Kucha Cleveland Vol. VI
Friday, Feb. 12th, 2010
308 Euclid Avenue
216-523-2583
Hope everyone is off to a great 2010!
Next Friday, February 12th, is the 1st PechaKucha of the new year, and we hope everyone will be able to make it out to see/hear the work and thoughts of some insanely creative people! Please forward this email to anyone you think would be interested! Event is free and open to all! Forgot to plan that Special Valentine’s Day dinner? Bring that special someone to PechaKucha on Friday to show them how much you love them. We’ll be giving away VERY romantic Valentine’s Day Cards! (hard to convey sarcasm, but these cards really are awesome..thanks Candra!)
See you Friday!
Cheers,
Mike Christoff & Raseem Parker
Feel free to check us out on Twitter, Facebook, and of course most importantly - pass along this email to ANYONE and EVERYONE you think would enjoy!:)
Photographs from previous Volumes of PechaKucha Night Cleveland can be seen @: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pkncleveland/ and on our Facebook Group Page.
Event webpage: www.pecha-kucha.org/night/cleveland/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PechaKuchaClev
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=55172018029&ref=ts
Next Friday, February 12th, is the 1st PechaKucha of the new year, and we hope everyone will be able to make it out to see/hear the work and thoughts of some insanely creative people! Please forward this email to anyone you think would be interested! Event is free and open to all! Forgot to plan that Special Valentine’s Day dinner? Bring that special someone to PechaKucha on Friday to show them how much you love them. We’ll be giving away VERY romantic Valentine’s Day Cards! (hard to convey sarcasm, but these cards really are awesome..thanks Candra!)
See you Friday!
Cheers,
Mike Christoff & Raseem Parker
Feel free to check us out on Twitter, Facebook, and of course most importantly - pass along this email to ANYONE and EVERYONE you think would enjoy!:)
Photographs from previous Volumes of PechaKucha Night Cleveland can be seen @: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pkncleveland/ and on our Facebook Group Page.
Event webpage: www.pecha-kucha.org/night/cleveland/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PechaKuchaClev
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=55172018029&ref=ts
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Roadtrip (15)! Kent State University Lecture Series (Spring 2010)
Kent State University has just posted their 2010 Spring Lecture Series (and the first one is coming right on up!)
Elena Manferdini
Design Is One
February 09, 2010 7:30 pm
Michael Schwartz Auditorium
Mark Foster Gage
Computation, Aesthetics & the Contemporary Baroque
February 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Hansey Barraza
Studio Luz
March 10, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Stephen Cassell
Architecture Research Office: Recent & Future Work
March 17, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Andrea Ponsi
Florence: A Map of Perceptions
March 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Michael Schwartz Auditorium
All lectures are free and open to the public unless otherwise noted. Visitor Parking for Cartwright Auditorium can be accessed off Terrace Drive. Visitor Parking for the Michael Schwartz Auditorium can be accessed off East Summit Street. For more information, please contact the College of Architecture & Environmental Design at 330 672 2917.
Elena Manferdini
Design Is One
February 09, 2010 7:30 pm
Michael Schwartz Auditorium
Mark Foster Gage
Computation, Aesthetics & the Contemporary Baroque
February 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Hansey Barraza
Studio Luz
March 10, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Stephen Cassell
Architecture Research Office: Recent & Future Work
March 17, 2010 7:00 pm
Cartwright Auditorium
Andrea Ponsi
Florence: A Map of Perceptions
March 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Michael Schwartz Auditorium
All lectures are free and open to the public unless otherwise noted. Visitor Parking for Cartwright Auditorium can be accessed off Terrace Drive. Visitor Parking for the Michael Schwartz Auditorium can be accessed off East Summit Street. For more information, please contact the College of Architecture & Environmental Design at 330 672 2917.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Cleveland Planning Commission Meeting - bike on a muthaf-ing bridge!
I never did see Snakes on a Plane, however if you have any interest in advocating for a cycling/pedestrian path on the innerbelt bridge because you are one of the people who live near and go to downtown Cleveland you may want to stop in at this Friday's Cleveland Planning Commission Meeting and show your support or voice your concern. Friday, February 5th.
Cleveland Planning Commission Meeting
601 Lakeside Avenue East Cleveland, OH 44114-1078
9am - 11.30am
Cleveland City Planning Commission meeting February 5th, 2010 9am Cleveland City Hall - Room 514 Agenda:An Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)representative will be present to address questions or concerns regarding the multi-purpose trail as a design alternative on the Innerbelt bridge.
Cleveland Planning Commission Meeting
601 Lakeside Avenue East Cleveland, OH 44114-1078
9am - 11.30am
Cleveland City Planning Commission meeting February 5th, 2010 9am Cleveland City Hall - Room 514 Agenda:An Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)representative will be present to address questions or concerns regarding the multi-purpose trail as a design alternative on the Innerbelt bridge.
The representative's presence is a direct result of discussions between advocates and Commision members during the Jan 22 meeting.
Agenda online: http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/designreview/schedule.shtml
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)